As tensions between Israel and Iran continue to escalate, anxiety is spreading far beyond the Middle East. With the United States now involved in military operations that have reportedly killed Iranian civilians in schools and hospitals and even targeted the office of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, many people around the world are beginning to ask a difficult question: where would be safe if a world war truly breaks out?
Indonesia has emerged as one of the countries considered safest if World War III were to happen. Reports from the Daily Mail and The Economic Times highlight several nations seen as relatively secure due to geography, neutrality, limited military presence, or strategic positioning.
Indonesia’s inclusion is tied to its long-standing free and active foreign policy and its role as a pioneer of the Non-Aligned Movement. As a vast archipelago with more than 17,000 islands, a large population, and a strong domestic market, Indonesia is not viewed as a primary strategic military target. Its chances of becoming directly involved in a war between superpowers are considered low.
Beyond Indonesia, several remote island nations in the Pacific are also viewed as safe options. Fiji, located north of New Zealand, is far removed from major geopolitical flashpoints. Its military force consists of around 6,000 personnel, making it one of the smallest in the world.
Tuvalu, another Pacific island country, is even smaller. With a population of just about 10,000 people, it does not maintain an active military force and relies only on police to maintain local order. Its isolation contributes to its reputation as a peaceful refuge.
New Zealand is also on the list. Situated in the southernmost part of the Southern Hemisphere, the country often maintains neutrality in geopolitical conflicts. It has about 15,000 defense personnel, primarily focused on maritime patrol and peacekeeping. At the same time, it maintains defense cooperation with Australia and the United States.
Read also: BPOM Named WHO Listed Authority, First Developing Nation to Reach Top Standard
In Europe, Iceland stands out for its remoteness. Located far northwest of mainland Europe, it is geographically isolated. Although it is a NATO member, Iceland does not have a traditional standing army. It operates only the Icelandic Coast Guard.
Switzerland, long associated with neutrality, is another country frequently cited as safe. It has maintained a neutral stance since World War II and avoids active military involvement in global conflicts.
In South America, Argentina and Chile are also considered relatively secure in a global conflict scenario. Argentina’s inclusion is based on research identifying countries suitable for living during global food shortages, despite its internal political challenges and history of domestic military conflict. Chile, which has the longest coastline in the world, benefits from abundant natural resources and strong infrastructure compared to other Latin American countries. It exports metals, fisheries products, and various fruits, contributing to its status as one of the most stable nations in South America.
In Asia, the Kingdom of Bhutan is highlighted for its neutrality. Since joining the United Nations in 1971, Bhutan has declared neutrality in conflicts. The country is also known as a safe and welcoming destination, particularly for female travelers.
At the far end of the spectrum lies Antarctica. While it may offer safety due to its extreme isolation and lack of permanent residents except for research personnel, survival there would require enduring severe cold. Access is limited, and most travel to the continent is by ship.
As global tensions rise, geography, neutrality, and limited military exposure appear to be key factors shaping perceptions of safety. Whether such precautions will ever be necessary remains uncertain, but for now, the conversation itself reflects the growing unease felt across the world.
